THE NEW GREEK JUNTA AND
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
One doesn’t have to be
acquainted with George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ and ‘1984’ to understand what is
happening in Greece, the cradle of democracy: it is enough to recall
Guicciardini’s dictum that the same things return with different colours.
In this case, instead of
the junta’s Foreign Minister, Pipinelis, refusing (in 1970) to renew the famous
Greek poet, ambassador and Nobel prizewinner, George Seferis’, diplomatic
passport, we have the current Greek Foreign Minister, Mr. Avramopoulos,
attempting to annul a recently retired Greek ambassador’s title of Ambassador ad honorem. The next stage is the
attempted withdrawal of the retired ambassador’s diplomatic passport.
Avramopoulos actually went
to the trouble of preparing a decree for the Greek president, Papoulias’,
signature, annulling the title. Papoulias, himself a former foreign minister,
signed it, despite the fact that he was once a vociferous critic of the junta. Plus ça change: the piercing analyst is
entitled to think that he is now a mere instrument of the new Euro-German
quisling junta: the image that comes to mind is that of a drunken fish swimming
feebly with the current.
My tetchy and colourful
rhetoric apart, let us take a quick but incisive look at what lies behind this
bizarre and irrational act by Mr. Avramopoulos, bearing in mind the studiously
oft-ignored human factors of greed, fear, ambition and envy. Avramopoulos is a
former Greek diplomat, who resigned to pursue a more lucrative career in
politics. Apart from emitting a good deal of hot air, including
attention-seeking impractical ideas such as ‘merging Greek and Turkish society’,
he has done nothing substantial for his country. This contrasts with
Chrysanthopoulos, who stuck it out, and has constantly fought, with
considerable panache, for his country. Avramopoulos actually praised
Chrysanthopoulos only a few months ago for his long-standing service and his
work as Secretary General of the Black Sea Economic Co-operation Conference.
Thus there is a curious dichotomy here, which leads one to wonder whether
outside influence has played any part. Greece has an unfortunate historical
tendency to succumb to various foreign pressures.
Unlike most Greek
politicians, Chrysanthopoulos cares for his country rather than for his
personal image. He is a leading member of an organisation that, inter alia, advocates Greece’s exit from
the Euro. He has written a number of articles critical of the government, and
has expressed strong views in interviews by leading international journalists.
Although Avramopoulos would not dare admit the reasons behind his silly move,
it is clear to even the most naïve observer that Chrysanthopoulos is being
attacked because his views have embarrassed the government.
As for President Papoulias,
who once fought vigorously against the 1967-74 junta, he now seems to have transmogrified
into a broken reed: one is inclined to wonder if he even thought about what he
was signing.
Let us return to that great
poet and Greek diplomat, George Seferis: his ‘crime’ was to have given an
interview to the BBC in 1970 that was critical of the junta. It was picked up
by the Soviet media, whereupon the junta accused him of acting against the
national interest. His treatment, and that of Chrysanthopoulos, smacks of
Goebbel- and Stalin-type behaviour, as well as that of the 1967-74 junta.
Who are the real traitors
in this tawdry tale? Certainly not Seferis or Chrysanthopoulos, both of whom
love their country, and who are exercising their democratic and constitutional
right to help Greece by justifiably criticising the quisling neo-Ottoman
plutocleptocratic junta that is destroying the fabric of the country. By their
silly action, Avramopoulos and President Papoulias have not served the
interests of Greece.
Dr. William Mallinson
Athens, 5 April 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment